On Thursday 23 September 2010 16:30:41 todd rme wrote: > I think a good solution integrated > into KDE by default is a must-have. No, this is a must-have for X. We as KDE should not dare to implement something like that. The probablity to get it wrong is very, very high. And the chances to get it somewhat working is very, very low. Getting this wrong would be a bigger desaster than the current sitiuation and yes it sucks and yes I myself have such a setup. Furthermore it would just be bad for the complete freedesktop if we did a solution which could not easily be reused by the other desktops (GNOME, XFCE) and yeah for them a Qt dependency would mean unusable :-P
So if we want to fix it, it needs to be done on X, but even there I think it is an unfixable issue (just imagine two screens with a gap between them, how do you want to recognize that), or somethin like that: ---------------------- | | | | A |___ B___ | |_____ |____ | | | C | |__________| (I hate ASCII art)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel