On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Hans Chen wrote: > What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines > regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and activities)? Are they
they are orthogonal concepts and i don't think we should at this time get too worked up about them. for those who don't use virtual desktops now -> not an issue for those who don't use activities -> not an issue for those who use both happily -> not an issue people who know virtual desktops but who are learning and using activities are the only ones really affected, and i think it's likely to be a "growing pains" issue as they adjust. it may just as well work itself out naturally. we don't know what their resulting work flows will be yet. that would be a matter for a field study or we can just wait and see. if/when we do know what the resulting work flow typically is for a virtual desktop and activities user, we can then take this topic up if we wish to. but imho right now it's "not an issue" :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel