On Monday 12 March 2012 10:54:52 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > 1. I'm all for removing the unmaintained decoration. > 2. I'm not sure about the rationale for moving oxygen's (deco) out of > kwin tree. > It is a decoration client, and therefore would best stay is in > kwin/clients. > (especially since it has to be build on top of kwin, unlike oxygen's > "libs" and oxygen's "style"). > > As for the argument "having all oxygen's code in one place". Well, that > would also require to have oxygen's widget style and oxygen's lib at the > same place. (which one ?). And you would still need a "liboxygen.so" > anyway, I think, for the code that is shared by the widget style and the > decoration. > > This to say, what would the moving actually address, solve ? > (you do need to build kwin anyway in order to build oxygen's client). I thought that Oxygen would have wanted to have all code in one place and that this has never been possible because the deco has to be inside kwin.
Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
