On Monday 04 June 2012, Daker Fernandes Pinheiro wrote: > > > as i said, my main concern is that framesvg is used a lot around in qml, > > so that would require again a new porting effort. > > In the proposed architecture [2], the porting effort wouldn't be much > painful, at least for the Plasma Components. > Please let me know what else we could make themable. > It would require removing the interaction code from the Plasma Components > and transforming it into a Style. > Obviously, this simplification of the Plasma Components would add these > desktop components dependecy on Plasma.
i would be fine with that... only thing i would be surprised if there wouldn't be enough api changes to require a massive porting effort of what has been just ported, all users of the components -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
