Hey, first of all thanks for caring :) Well it looks quite close to the status quo imho, but it occurred to me we have indeed a serious naming problem (which I believe was the main source of misunderstanding over the last days) on all of this. In my opinion the diagram makes more sense when s/Workspace/Desktop. I see more the concept of "workspaces", aka desktop, mobile, tablet etc...
Another thing is that we have way too many names: software compilation, active, workspace, etc... I mean if we, the people working on that, are confused, how could a user feel? I guess a goal for the next sprint should indeed be starting from something like this and drawing a scenario, also in a marketing perspective. 2012/6/7 Aurélien Gâteau <agat...@kde.org>: > Hi, > > Spent some time yesterday evening on drawing a diagram of KDE architecture, as > I proposed in an other thread. Please have a look and tell me what's wrong in > it. > > Aurélien > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel