On Thursday, June 7, 2012 13:47:06 Dario Freddi wrote: > Well it looks quite close to the status quo imho,
i think it reflects the understanding many have, yes. > but it occurred to > me we have indeed a serious naming problem (which I believe was the > main source of misunderstanding over the last days) on all of this. In > my opinion the diagram makes more sense when s/Workspace/Desktop. I > see more the concept of "workspaces", aka desktop, mobile, tablet > etc... calling it "desktop" fails for various reasons (all of which have been discussed extensively elsewhere in past years): * we have the legacy of "desktop" both in "KDE" and "the KDE Desktop" * a t.v. recorder is not a desktop. we might be able to grin and say "that tablet is running a desktop system", but that is even a bit of a stretch. that said .. there are certainly bigger issues than this we have to in front of us to tackle to bring our efforts into sync. > I guess a goal for the next sprint should indeed be starting from > something like this and drawing a scenario, also in a marketing > perspective. there will be enough on the agenda without adding marketing to it, and there are many people not there who ought to be if marketing was part of the mix. -1 -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
