On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > I won't be there at the meeting unfortunately. I'll log it to read it. > Personally I like things to be said face to face that's why I take time > to write these mails. And I do feel targeted. > In any case I hope I clarified my position and if this one reverted > commit by me was not done properly (I think I never behaved unfairly > within KDE, have I?), this happens quite often. Happened from you too. > Let's then have a rule of review everything properly. > > If Valorie's mail had not come I was about to mail Kevin (ervin) in > order to have a mediator of some sort, because I was uncomfortable with > this, not for me but for all plasma caring people (which may be or not > "The Plasma Team").
yes, many thanks to Valorie from me as well for taking care of this. as what should be the content of the meeting: it should be about methodology: there is obviously a problem in how issues are dealth with. what i hope for the meeting is to come out about an agreed procedure on how to deal with when there is a disagreement about a particular thing, in the end accepted conditions where one says "i still don't agree, but i'll accept the decision" to be clear, there shouldn't be personal issues discussed there, since is a public discussion. there may be some, but if it is the case they should be solved in private Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel