On Monday 19 August 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > 3. ‘2’ ... why “two” if this is version 5? well, libplasma is actually > > going to be version 6 iirc, so it isn’t the library. > > Not that its relevant for the rest of the discussion, but as the library > number itself is concerned you can make it 5. And that's in fact my > preference as I'd like all our library numbers to be in sync for a change. > :-) > > Regards.
yes, plasma2 has .so.5 atm, plasma1 is 4 -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
