On Monday 19 August 2013 23:08:15 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 19 August 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > 3. ‘2’ ... why “two” if this is version 5? well, libplasma is actually > > > going to be version 6 iirc, so it isn’t the library. > > > > Not that its relevant for the rest of the discussion, but as the library > > number itself is concerned you can make it 5. And that's in fact my > > preference as I'd like all our library numbers to be in sync for a change. > > > > :-) > > > > Regards. > > yes, plasma2 has .so.5 atm, plasma1 is 4
Yep, only kdecore and kdeui were ahead because of a very old binary compatibility breakage during the KDE2 (IIRC) timeframe. But guess what? Those two are almost gone (I'll likely make the commits to clean them for good tomorrow). :-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel