On Thursday 22 August 2013 20:36:24 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > Hello, > > On 21 August 2013 12:49, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My vote would go for Plasma. > > +1, just "Plasma" without "KDE". > > On 21 August 2013 21:38, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > another idea: let's drop the version number completely and only use it > > internally (bugtracker, libs, etc.) > > I was thinking this too. But when a new version comes out how could we > promote it? Quoting our release announcement for 4.11: "KDE is delighted to announce its latest set of releases, providing major updates to KDE Plasma Workspaces, KDE Applications, and the KDE Platform." > Also if a product doesn't have a version then this could mean that it is > rolling. > Yes not always but this is the first thought that goes through the mind. No? And a rolling release might have version numbers. I'm using a rolling distro and it has version numbers, but I never know which one it is. So that argument works in both direction. I think there is no real sign that rolling releases do not have a version number.
Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
