Hello, with the "chaotic" nature of (future) release cycles for individual components the "date version number" format (for example "2013.08") is probably a good idea :)
If I am not mistaken it was actually you (Martin G.) who initially suggested that :) On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org>wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 20:38:05 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s > try to > > > come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month. > > > > another idea: let's drop the version number completely and only use it > > internally (bugtracker, libs, etc.). > and yet another idea: code names instead of release numbers. And as we have > such nice codenames all over our code base (hello Corona) I would suggest > code > names out of the field of Physics/Science e.g. > * Plasma Higgs-Boson > > Cheers > Martin > > P.S. and that would give us a wonderful opportunity to bike-shed about a > name > each other month ;-) > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
