My thoughts below. - Dropping the term "workspace": Seems sensible to me. It even seems this was the original intention [0].
- Calling it version 2. This makes a lot of sense, having a software compilation of KDE Plasma 5.x and KDE Applications 5.y, where x and y are different would be very very confusing. One thing that wasn't clear to me on the original proposals and has just been mentioned by Giorgos is the prefix "KDE". KDE is not just "the community" but also "an umbrella brand for the technology created by the KDE community" [0]. I have heard other people make comments about how "Plasma is trying to distance itself from the KDE community". I don't agree with those people, but we shouldn't fuel that fire. Displaying that it is part of the KDE umbrella is IMHO important. [0] http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
