On Monday 05 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > The baseline, to use "Plasma" as the brand, and only refer to the version > as a technicality should of course stay the same. > > Why do I think 5 is better than 2014.6, or <year>.<month of release>?
After trying (with not much success) to use publicly the next/2014.06 scheme, I have to agree that I would feel more confortable with either Plasma 5 or Plasma 2 To me either of which wouldn't make much difference, it's true tough that looks less confusing if it has the same number as frameworks and Qt -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel