+1 And, its easier to "say" as well :)
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > The baseline, to use "Plasma" as the brand, and only refer to the version > > as a technicality should of course stay the same. > > > > Why do I think 5 is better than 2014.6, or <year>.<month of release>? > > After trying (with not much success) to use publicly the next/2014.06 > scheme, > I have to agree that I would feel more confortable with either Plasma 5 or > Plasma 2 > To me either of which wouldn't make much difference, it's true tough that > looks less confusing if it has the same number as frameworks and Qt > > > -- > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > -- Shantanu Tushar (UTC +0530) http://www.shantanutushar.com
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
