On Saturday, January 03, 2015 18:23:07 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed that it > was unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma Desktop > specifically, so we thought it would make sense to clarify this. > > Therefore, we went ahead and drafted some communication guidelines I'd like > to present for discussion: > > - When talking about the the Plasma technology generically, use only > "Plasma", omitting the "5" as that is just an iteration of Plasma. > > - When talking about a particular version of the technology, but not a > specific shell, use "Plasma [version]" e.g. "Plasma 5.1". > > - When talking about the a specific shell but not about a specific version, > use "Plasma [shell], e.g. "Plasma Desktop" > > - When talking about a specific shell in a particular version, use "Plasma > [version] [shell]" e.g. "Plasma 5.2 Desktop", "Plasma 5.4 Active" > > For example in release announcement we'd talk about the Plasma 5.2 release > and when there are shell specific changes we could write "Plasma Desktop > now has addition X" > > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publish it and > where should we announce it?
This nomenclature sounds fine to my ears. Does this need announcement? I think the Dot editors have some wiki pages with these things, but other than that, to my biased self, this is common knowledge / common sense? Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel