On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeif...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 14:11:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publish it > > > and > > > where should we announce it? > > > > This nomenclature sounds fine to my ears. Does this need announcement? I > > think the Dot editors have some wiki pages with these things, but other > > than that, to my biased self, this is common knowledge / common sense? > > Well, if it were clear to everyone, we wouldn't have taken the effort to > define a naming scheme in the first place. Maybe the VDG is the only group > to > which this wasn't clear yet (we were not sure whether to call it "Plasma > Desktop 5", "Plasma 5 Desktop" or "the Plasma 5 desktop", for example), but > maybe it's not 100% clear to others, either. The broad nomenclature is > probably clear at least to people within KDE by now, but we believe a good > brand communication should be consistent down to details like the ones > mentioned above. > > It probably doesn't need a public announcement, any maybe sending it to the > two lists I sent it to was sufficient. I'd also update the "KDE Brand Map" > [1] > if that's the document which people who do public communication refer to. > Looking at the wiki, it says "KDE Plasma *". Originally we went for "Plasma by KDE" format to get further from the idea that Plasma = KDE and make the rebranding clearer. Was that dropped? Or just forgotten? Imho puts a nicer touch to the name than "KDE Plasma" (which still supports the Plasma = KDE) Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel