In all fairness Thomas mentioned that too :D But we thought "oh computer stuff works, lets keep it" plus its a nice catch-all word isn't it... Don't know of an alternative to it without adding a lot of extra word faffing tbh. (Anyone who knows: HALP!)
During CERN professionals came up as an example of what we wanted to aim to, now we may have gone in a tad hard for that (since I like exclusions as a way to define ourselves) - either that or we are stuck with "enthusiasts" (which means nothing at all) or "hobbyists" (which is not a grand group to be connected to when it comes to words I feel - I may be wrong of course these are just my reasonings) On Monday, 4 April 2016 15:04:30 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On 4 April 2016 at 14:58, Jens Reuterberg <jens...@kolabnow.com> wrote: > > Thanks for feedback! :) > > > >> First, it looks very professional, nice :) > >> one thing tough , is the underline of the words, the red underline may > >> look > >> like a spellcheck error (i'm wondering if something else could be used > >> instead of an underline, like bullets, those icons in small, or just a > >> background..) > > > > Yes now that you say it it does look like a spelling check going on :D Ok > > ok this calls for some experimentation. Will edit that > > > > But the text? What do you think about the text? > > I'm not convinced performant is a word although it seems to be used > for computer jargon > > http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38945/what-is-wrong-with-the-word > -performant > > The main part which surprises me is the user profile for professional > users. I guess you've thought about who that includes and who it > excludes? How does it differentiate us from the competition? > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel