On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 10:46:55 AM Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2016, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Monday 04 April 2016 17:29:58 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Montag, 4. April 2016 15:04:30 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > > > > It is clearly jargon. As Jens already said, the question is: Can we > > > afford the jargon or not? We think we can, but there are certainly also > > > good arguments against it. > > > > I don't like it. How about "nimble", it expresses power and speed in a > > positively sounding adjective. > > to me nimble sounds like "small footprint" while would be a good aim to > have in the future, i am not sure i could tell that around with a straight > face on the current state... (and if is so contrary to the current > perception it may really backfire)
The vision is not about the current state, it's a description of our goal. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel