hpereiradacosta added a comment.

  
  
  >> I have pushed a fix to the "current" shadows already. so you would need to 
rebase this patch to master. (I did it locally, this will create some minor 
conflicts). 
  >>  I also have a local patch for fixing the MDI shadows on top of this 
patch, if you are interested.
  > 
  > MDI shadows have another problem? Is it because of this patch?
  
  Yes (another problem) and no (because of this patch).
  
  As you quoted on IRC, they used the raw shadowSize enum as an actual value. 
This was correct for the old-old shadows, but not any more when Nathan and 
myself switched to using an enum. Thats what required fixing, disregarding 
whether your patch gets landed or not.
  
  > 
  > 
  >> Note that I also commented on the possible horizontal offset that you left 
in your implementation, for the kdecoration part. It also applies here. I would 
drop it :)
  > 
  > Yeah, I added them to keep everything consistent(the box shadow helper 
expects QPoint to be an offset). I'd like to keep it, if you don't mind. :)
  
  Ok. No problem. 
  Still, you'll probably need to rebase your patch to the current master 
(because of the fix I introduced above)

REPOSITORY
  R31 Breeze

BRANCH
  shadows

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D11175

To: zzag, #breeze, #vdg, hpereiradacosta
Cc: abetts, ngraham, plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, 
jensreuterberg, sebas, apol, mart

Reply via email to