2010/5/4 ineiev <[email protected]> > Now we can discuss the motives of that man if you wish: why may he > want to keep the software proprietary? > (which is slightly off-topic).
Completely off-topic, but anyway: #1 he/she may have strong POV on development and style of project. #2 he/she may have plans to sell that piece of software in future. #3 he/she may have eccentric mind and don't want to share. Oddish, but have chance to be. i can continue. Again (out of curiosity), because you can't imagine any reason > they might have or because you have some other proof? For example - I know them personally. > Sorry, I can't catch your words. EULA written by the end user? I always >> think that EULA's are written by the companies... >> > > Sure. and the end user have no say there. no free-will. Free-will is will to choose. You have will to not agree with EULA and press 'No' 'Quit' in anytime. > If those clauses included in EULA, it is problems of end-user if he's >> not >> give full attention to what he 'Agree, Continue' :) That's legal education >> issue I think. >> > > Nonetheless, an unconscious free-will assignment is nonsense. Unconscious acts often leads to no good. I don't think the punishment is a strong guarantee. > just my personal point of view. :) Strong guarantee may give only god. Do you remember '640 kb will be enough for all'? Never mind. the person who runs the campaign is a native speaker, he'll fix > the linguistic issues easily. > Sure. If he will that'll be great. Regards and long live to Ogg, open-source and open-mind. Oleg
