Completely off-topic, but anyway:
sorry for being pedantic, but i believe there is a big misunderstanding on the
nature of free software licences. None of them in any way restrict the original
author of the code.
#1 he/she may have strong POV on development and style of project.
So do many large free software projects. Some of them will not even consider
additions which have minor issues with brackets in the different places, etc.
some may not accept patches at all.
#2 he/she may have plans to sell that piece of software in future.
Free software licenses do not restrict the original author in any way, since the
author never had to agree to any license. Only the users are limited in some way
(and in case of GPL, for example, only in the event when they wish to
redistribute the work based on the downloaded code). So i can write some code
under GPL and then turn around and sell the rights to it to Microsoft...
A lot of people dual licence stuff.
- Volodya
--
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
