Dnia 08-07-2005, pią o godzinie 23:02 +0200, Tomasz Wittner napisał(a): > On Fri 8. of July 2005 18:34, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > > On Friday 08 July 2005 19:17, twittner wrote: > > > +Version: 2005.07.08 > > > +Release: 0.1 > > > +License: BSD > > uh! such versioning just begs for epoch bump afterwards! > > > I can't imagine such situation (but I'm not brilliant ;) - version is taken > from date '+%Y.%m.%d' . Please, provide an example when bumping epoch is > necessary - show me output from: > > rpmvercmp YYYY.MM.DD-relX yyyy.mm.dd-relY
We use versioning as follows: (1.)0.20050708-0.1 Then reverting to another snapshot or changing the versioning scheme allows for smooth upgrades within the same epoch. For example if author decides to give the next release a number of 2.0 instead of a date. -- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
