On 7/9/05, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For me this is perfectly human readable. What if I were to call my > > maybe. but not for me. > > > encryption package ZW5jcnlwdAo (for example because it is how it > > encrypts some word)? You would propose a different name? > > well, it doesn't matter how it sounds. we're talking about numbers (for > your information).
So, if I ware to call a particular version this way? Who said versions need to be numeric... -- Michal Moskal, http://nemerle.org/~malekith/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
