On Sat 9. of July 2005 12:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 09 of July 2005 11:15, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:46:15 +0200 > > Tomasz Wittner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > your versioning is your personal problem. but in PLD you _must_ follow > > PLD's versioning schema (already pointed by Patrys). No comment - I have a good laugh. > Huh? We follow author versioning unless these are snapshots where in this case > these aren't snapshots it seems. Yes, it isn't snapshot. I make tarball after finishing and testing my work not in the half way. Now, I agree, my versioning schema may leads people to confusion - this thread shows that, but I found such versioning convenient for me - I needn't hesitate when and why one version should be 0.3.4 and next 1.2.5 - version is generated from `date '+%Y.%m.%d'` by my private release.sh script. You can see rcorder.spec (another my rework) and pure-config - they have similar versioning schema. Finally, I don't force people to using these programs. -- Tomasz Wittner _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
