To: proper language list On Sun, 13 May 2007, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote:
> Jan Rekorajski wrote: > > Any thoughts? Comments? > > Yup. It was discussed to death. It doesn't fit to PLD. It was always discussed in context of switching to SVN, never by itself. And the oposition was against a screwed tag/branch design in SVN. > And even more important is that qboosh doesn't like it. If he won't > commit than we're all doomed so better don't mess with this stuff. (or > invent something clever) I'd like to see _his_ comments, not what _you_ think he thinks. > Btw. I think we could get the required parameters from a custom system > (possibly based on Mercurial since it's nice and in Python but it could > be some other system) and that the off-the-shelf VCS are not for us. IMO GIT is good (full disconnected operation), and _maybe_ SVN if it wasn't screwed by design wrt tags. Janek -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en