Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14-05-2007 01:05]: > On Mon, 14 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: >> Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14-05-2007 00:41]: [...] >>> I don't think you understood, I'm not proposing VCS change, that's for >>> the future. I'm proposing layout change to make it _possible_ to even >>> consider a VCS change. >> I'm sure I did. I just see it differently: changing layout to a *worse* > Why worse?
To avoid making up reasons (and repeating ourselves about excessive metadata): I would find this structure more annoying. Longer paths, the need for mkdir. > Sorry, but the only real problem you stated is that scripts will stop > working, and that can be easily fixed. That was, as I wrote, `off the top of my head', not an analysis. Alright, a weak argument. ;-) >> one so it's possible to switch to a *worse* (for this purpose) VCS. > Anything to back up this statement? There are more VCSs than just CVS > or SVN. Widely used (in OSS world)? Come on... Everything (?) else features and focuses on distributed repositories, which we don't need. If there existed a better VCS for our needs, someone would outline the gains and we'd have switched already. -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp3DRA7fGabh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en