On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > > and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading > > packages from ac-updates afterall? > > updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference > between ac/ti/th when you can update everything?? Maybe let's update RA > to kernel 2.6.25
point me to the document where's written what for was intended purpose of ac-updates. however having just updates or just security won't work as updated packages depend on each other, so you end up needing for package in general a package security tree or vice versa. and easiest way to fix security issues is upgrade software, to catch up the patch from upstream. i haven't noticed active security team to patch and backport changes to old versions in pld. we don't have such developer power (and apparently no interest either) like debian does. -- glen _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en