Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote: >>> and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with >>> 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at >>> least three years old kernel. upstream is near 2.6.25 already. and th/ti >>> do have 2.6.22 kernel, do you shout there too? >> So what? >> Why not upgrade glibc in ac to 2.7? and XFree to xorg - they are also >> very old. This is STABLE so minor updates or security updates are >> welcome. bugs.pld-... is not the place for this request. > > glibc = would break 2.4 kernel compatability (afaik already glibc 2.4 > required > 2.6.0 kernel), that has been accidentally already broken several times. > intentionally broking it would be evil. > > xorg 7.0 = too much to rebuild with so less gain, and so far there's no > binary > incompatibility that i've encountered using X11 (aka xorg 6.9). > > and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's need > to > support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it was released. > and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would mean changing the > distro, i.e dropping some architectures and 2.4 kernel compatability. > What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel?? Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features? upgrade kernel for desktops in AC - useless upgrade kernel for servers - more useless
-- T. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en