On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > Elan Ruusamäe pisze: > > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > >>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's > >>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it > >>> was released. and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would > >>> mean changing the distro, i.e dropping some architectures and 2.4 > >>> kernel compatability. > >> > >> What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel?? > >> Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help > >> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features? > >> upgrade kernel for desktops in AC - useless > > > > explain? > > If I have new machine I wont install AC. Give me one reason to do so and > not to install Ti(or Th)
Against Th - I still believe it's not as stable as it should be, though I am using Th (th+th-test) on one machine only, so I can't really compare it to th (without th-test). Against Ti - no pros nor cons, don't know it. > If I have old machine with AC - it is working what's the point of > upgrading kernel? Because new shiny raid controller just arrived. Or you had motherboard failure and replaced it with one having a RTL8111/8168B based NIC. Or ... > As I said before, why not upgrading RA packages for security/features > reason - I have 2 RA servers well working and dont want to migrate them. So do I, but I also have Ac servers that I care about. And I have Ac on my laptop, where I'd like to play a bit with kernel-desktop. -- http://www.agmk.net/ - hosting, strony www, opieka informatyczna _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
