On 2015-11-27 10:28, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 25.11.2015 22:19, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
If there are no objections, I may try a mass-update of python-* specs
tomorrow.
more like in the weekend ;)
afaik not all packages supported --build-base thing. i don't know why.
Most current Python packages can use setup.py same way. There might be
problem with outdated packages, but you can find such which wouldn't
even use 'setup.py' at all.
I think a very small minority of the packages would be broken by
replacing setup.py with py_build/py_install.
Most of our python specs that don't use '--build-base' are those which
were never updated for Python 3 support or which were written before the
'--build-base' trick was known to the spec author.
you can find such packages with something like this:
➔ grep -r 'set --' ~/all-specs
/home/users/glen/all-specs/python-httplib2.spec:set -- *
Are you sure this is not some alternative to the '--build-base'?
But thanks, I will look at those.
Jacek
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
