On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:11:48PM +0200, maHo wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:19:07 +0200, Kacper Kornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:14:46AM +0200, maHo wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:36:29 +0200, Kacper Kornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 06:57:19PM +0200, maHo wrote: > > > [ciach] > > > > > I looked into the cvs log of nspr and amount of branches thrills me. > > > > > If I looked correctly, there is no PR_AI_NOCANONNAME at head of nspr. > > > > > So I put --without-system-nspr into our mozilla-firebird and I'm > > > > > checking if will work properly. It's building now. > > > > > > > > But there is a tag FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE. I have managed to build firefox > > > > and mozilla using it. > > > > > > I'm talking about nspr. Do the system-wide nspr from firefox branch > > > isn't good idea. Build --without-system-nspr is better IMHO. > > > > I also mean nspr and tag FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE in nspr cvs. > > I don't understand what do you want. do you want to use nspr source > from cvs with FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE in nspr.spec?
I took the source of nspr from their cvs (FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE tag), compiled and installed it. Then I was able to compile firefox using --with-system-nspr flag. -- Kacper Kornet _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
