On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:54:11 +0200, Kacper Kornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:11:48PM +0200, maHo wrote: [ciach] > > > > I don't understand what do you want. do you want to use nspr source > > from cvs with FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE in nspr.spec? > > I took the source of nspr from their cvs (FIREFOX_0_10_1_RELEASE tag), > compiled and installed it. Then I was able to compile firefox using > --with-system-nspr flag.
but why did you something like that?. exactly the same sources are in firefox source, so there is no point to download the same data again, compile and use with --system...., because it's the same result as --without-system-nspr, but without additional effort. if you want to make system wide nspr from firefox 0.10.1 release sources, then I think it's very bad idea. It's incompatible with nspr trunk which is used by mozilla (for example there is no selectLocaleForProfile() in nsIChromeRegistry from firefox nspr). regards maHo ps: why do you include [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Reply-To: twice? _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
