It seems like on Sunday 14 of November 2004 20:15, Marcin Kr�l typed: > > Do you have such version? If so, please tag the earlier version as > > Ac-branch, because this update seems to break the Ac dependencies. > > It wasn't sent to builders, its not on ftp, so what dependencies are > broken? :) There are no dependencies in CVS AFAIK :)
Yet. Although, at some point someone might send it and it *won't* build. In such cases (when something isn't supposed to be in Ac for some reasons) branching previous revision is the best solution. > The only reason I > know why automake 1.9 is not included in AC is that it would make some > specs fail to build. Anyway... Branched, and I've learned something new > while doing this :-) I don't care at all! Havner said it's almost clear that automake 1.9 won't appear in Ac as the replacement for the current automake. He's the RM and I don't want to enforce my solutions. Otherwise, we'll never release Ac. -- Michal Chruszcz -=- Seen at http://1lo.sanok.pl/~troll/gallery.php _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
