It seems like on Sunday 14 of November 2004 21:56, Marcin Kr�l typed: > > Yet. Although, at some point someone might send it and it *won't* > > build. In such cases (when something isn't supposed to be in Ac for > > some reasons) branching previous revision is the best solution. > > True, but someone may still try to send HEAD version to builders anyway > :)
Unless there is an AC-branch and that one isn't djurban with his stuff, we don't have to worry about it. > > I don't care at all! Havner said it's almost clear that automake 1.9 > > won't appear in Ac as the replacement for the current automake. > > Yep. I know this already. > > > He's the RM and I don't want to enforce my solutions. > > I'm not enforcing anything and I don't ask anyone to enforce his own > solutions. I'm not saying you are. I'm just saying for saying. :-P > > Otherwise, we'll never release Ac. > > We are going to _release_ it? :) (just joking, sorry, couldn't resist) Yes, we are. Wake up! Two days ago we decided to release Ac, didn't we? =-] -- Michal Chruszcz -=- Seen at http://1lo.sanok.pl/~troll/gallery.php _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
