> "Pomocy, zainstalowałem kde-common i nie działa mi KDE!!!" ;) > > Gdyby to było -devel-common albo -common-devel, takie pomyłki byłyby > dużo mniej prawdopodobne.
Niestety nie wszyscy przyjmują tę argumentację: > --- shadow/129150 Thu Dec 11 17:16:54 2003 > +++ shadow/129150.tmp.30952 Thu Dec 11 17:24:35 2003 > @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ > Bug#: 129150 > Product: gnome-common > Version: HEAD > OS: Linux > OS Details: PLD Linux Distribution 2.0 > -Status: NEW > -Resolution: > +Status: RESOLVED > +Resolution: WONTFIX > Severity: trivial > Priority: Normal > Component: general > AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > TargetMilestone: --- > @@ -17,6 +17,17 @@ > The name gnome-common implies that this package contains some > routines > shared by various parts of the GNOME desktop, making end users want > to > install it. In fact, it's of no practical use for them. > > I'd suggest to rename the package to something that corresponds more > to its > function, like gnome-build-tools or similar. > + > +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-12-11 17:24 ------- > +Sorry, but it is not practical to rename a package like this. It has > +been called gnome-common for about four years and every piece of > +documentation and every other package that refers to it in an error > +message would need to be changed. > + > +If people are installing packages just because they like the name, we > +cannot really help them. The gnome-common package is not listed in > any > +package list for GNOME releases, so we should be fairly safe (it also > +causes no harm if somebody does accidently install it). -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Never trust a man | | who can count up to 1023 on his fingers. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
