Eric Laberge wrote:
> That's a good idea. I think we should agree on a version numbering system
> first. IMHO, major should remain "0" until everything works and is stable
> (six months? a year?). Minor should reflects milestone improvements, and
> start at 1 (0 makes it seems too... hem... "doesn't run at all"). I
> consider milestone improvements something like having an OS working in a
> usable way, like being able to input some commands (like DOS 6.22 right
> now, though it achieves this by major hacks, if I understood correctly).
> Revisions brings some improvements that we feel worthy enough for public
> release. Minor corrections (bug fixes, etc.) could simply be added a letter.
> Following this scheme, I suggest beginning at 0.1.0.
0.1.0 is good with me.
-Kevin
