Ramon van Handel wrote: > Yes it is, but an optimised video driver isn't the real world --- it's a hack > made specifically for VMs. You don't HAVE to make it work like in the real > world! It should be possible to do what you want (if it isn't it needs to > be added!), but I wouldn't do it this way for the optimised driver. What I'd > do: > > (1) let the guest allocate a piece of physical memory > (2) let the guest pass the address to the plex86 plugin using I/O ports > (3) the plex86 plugin will use the specified chunk of memory for its > framebuffer. The VM should not waste CPU-ressources on scanning this buffer for changes. There should be an mechanism to tell the host-code which parts of the frame-buffer have to be redrawn. Elmar
- video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Kevin Lawton
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Elmar Haneke
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Andrew Stewart
- Re: video driver protocol Elmar Haneke
- Re: video driver protocol Wouter Coene
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
