Jeroen Janssen wrote: > > > The VM should not waste CPU-ressources on scanning this buffer for > > changes. > > > > There should be an mechanism to tell the host-code which parts of the > > frame-buffer have to be redrawn. > > I first want to do "worst case scenario" (when all pixels need to be > drawn)... depending on the guest OS display driver abilities, it might > also be possible to have a list with "dirty" areas that need to be > redrawn, but this stands/fails with the ability to detect wich areas are > "dirty". The Video-Driver should know which areas to redraw. I would suggest to forward this knowledge to the host-code. It might be sensible to make the "framebuffer" read-only for the guest-code and let the guest send drawing-commands to the host. Elmar
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Kevin Lawton
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Elmar Haneke
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Andrew Stewart
- Re: video driver protocol Elmar Haneke
- Re: video driver protocol Wouter Coene
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
- Re: video driver protocol Jeroen Janssen
- Re: video driver protocol Ramon van Handel
