Re: [plex86] More on C++

[Mikael Jansson]

>
>Which is why I STRONGLY recommend using only the lightest-weight parts 
of
>C++ that offer the greatest benefits.  I haven't looked at ObjectiveC 
that
>closely, but remember that Next did write nearly an entire OS in that
>language, and it ran quite well.  Something to look at as an example of
>high-performance system-level OO.
>
Staying off-topic, there's also BeOS, which is written entirely in C++ 
(minus kernel land. Well, that doesn't make it entirely C++ based. But 
90% of it.).

--
Mikael J @ http://hem.spray.se/tic_khr
Registered and Proud BeOS Developer