On 2009-07-15 22:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > [...]To summarize the choice we can have > no soft landings or no cmake-gui. > > Which is the preferred choice that we use until this can of worms is cleaned > up by the CMake developers? > > I would be happy to implement whatever we decide and write up the resulting > limitation in our build system (no soft landings or no cmake-gui) in > README.release.
Ugh. I just had pointed out to me by a CMake user on the CMake list (and I also confirmed) that ccmake also has the same problem as cmake-gui. So if the CMake developers can't come up with a workaround for this ccmake AND cmake-gui issue I will probably go back to the 5.9.4 hard landing model. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
