On 2009-07-15 22:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:

> [...]To summarize the choice we can have
> no soft landings or no cmake-gui.
>
> Which is the preferred choice that we use until this can of worms is cleaned
> up by the CMake developers?
>
> I would be happy to implement whatever we decide and write up the resulting
> limitation in our build system (no soft landings or no cmake-gui) in
> README.release.

Ugh.  I just had pointed out to me by a CMake user on the CMake list (and I
also confirmed) that ccmake also has the same problem as cmake-gui.  So if
the CMake developers can't come up with a workaround for this ccmake AND
cmake-gui issue I will probably go back to the 5.9.4 hard landing model.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation
for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software
package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of
Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project
(lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to