On 2010-07-12 19:44-0700 Jerry wrote:

> I'm beginning to have second thoughts about whether this HAVE_ADA_2007
> business is worth the trouble. If the flag is not set, the Ada
> bindings still work fine if the compiler is Ada 95 or Ada 2005. None
> of the lapack and blas stuff is actually used--only two lines of
> declarations are used from the Ada modules and these are already
> inserted into the bindings if the flag is not set. I think maybe
> requiring the linking of these large libraries is a bad idea and that
> I over-engineered the bindings just to get the two declarations in the
> case of 2005.
>
> How much work would it be to just remove this flag?

I think very little effort would be required to remove HAVE_ADA_2007
from the build system.  However, let's wait to do anything about this
until we understand the linking issue that Orion reported a lot more.
I still think the linking issue may be completely orthogonal to
HAVE_ADA_2007.  You imply above, that lapack/blas are not used by
HAVE_ADA_2007 so it appears to me that Orion's discovery of a
lapack/blas linking issue must be completely independent of
HAVE_ADA_2007.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation
for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software
package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of
Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project
(lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to