On 11/17/2016 07:26 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > Hi Hazen: > > My recent set of changes introduced no changes concerning the meaning > of PLPLOT_USE_QT5. In fact, my recent tests of those changes (see my > commit message) show Plplot builds properly here with both > -DPLPLOT_USE_QT5=ON (i.e., Qt5) and -DPLPLOT_USE_QT5=OFF (i.e, Qt4). > But in each case I used scripts/comprehensive_test.sh which > automatically executes cmake in the ideal way, i.e., in an initially > empty build tree. > > In your case, it looks like -DPLPLOT_USE_QT5=ON is being ignored and > you are getting consistent Qt4 results instead. (Your cache file > reports PLPLOT_USE_QT5=OFF and nothing is found that is Qt5 related.) > > Is a dirty build tree reflecting previous Qt4 builds causing you the > present difficulties with attempting to use Qt5? > > Of course, if that speculation is not correct, then the next thing you > should do is look at your complete cmake output starting with an empty > build tree and pristine source tree to see what it says regarding > finding Qt5 when you specify -DPLPLOT_USE_QT5=ON. If our build system > cannot > find Qt5 with -DPLPLOT_USE_QT5=ON it forces PLPLOT_USE_QT5 to > OFF and falls back to looking for and using Qt4 in a consistent way. > > So either scenario (dirty build tree or cannot find Qt5) is consistent > with your current cache file.
Sorry, it appears that I was missing the qttools5-dev package. As an aside it looks like x02c works fine with Qt5 even in -fam mode. -Hazen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
