Hi, Alan, On Jan 4, 2010, at 16:52 , David MacMahon wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 15:54 , Alan W. Irwin wrote: > >> On 2010-01-04 14:24-0800 David MacMahon wrote: >> >> For your xwin.ps result (and also my own as viewed with gv) I >> don't believe >> plot 3 is any dimmer than the rest. > > Thanks for your reply, Alan. I tried viewing xwin.ps on Linux > using "gv" and it looks fine. I guess there is something in the > PostScript that the Apple viewer does not like. I've attached a > (hopefully small) screen shot showing the appearance in both gv > (running on Linux) and Safari (Apple's browser running on MacOSX). I think the plwid(1) call in plot2() results in the line widths being thinner in the final plot than in the other three plots. If you zoom in using gv, you will see that the text has an outline appearance and that the lines are thinner than on the previous plots. If I disable the Apple viewer's "Anti-alias text and line art" option, then it looks the same as in gv. Also, if I comment out the plwid() calls in plot2() (in x01c.c), the - saveD postscript looks OK even with the viewer's anti-alias option on. Is the "plwid(1)" call in plot2() using an incorrect value to restore the line width? Thanks, Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Plplot-general mailing list Plplot-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-general
