I tend to use something like choice 1 to approximate this thing when
I need it (and I tend to need it when I push functional class-based
programming during "hell" projects). -- Matthias
On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Good point. I guess I'll deal for now.
Two ideas:
A syntax form that works with an interface (updateable<%>) that makes
the class deal with this stuff. (A related note syntax transformers in
the class system's interfaces might work analogous to the unit
system's)
A syntax form that is only legal inside the the class, so it can know
what all the fields are. (Although this would probably break for a
subclass's private fields.)
Jay
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Ah, I asked this question recently only to be reminded of my age
by my grad
students. How'd you copy private vars and methods?
On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Is there any way of making something like struct-copy for objects?
It seems like object-info and class-info have the machinery, but I'm
wondering if there's some fundamental reason it wouldn't work.
I'd like to use the object system functionally without writing
lots of
boiler plate.
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy <[email protected]>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://teammccarthy.org/jay
"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
--
Jay McCarthy <[email protected]>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://teammccarthy.org/jay
"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
