2009/3/16 Jay McCarthy <[email protected]>: > Good point. I guess I'll deal for now. > > Two ideas: > > A syntax form that works with an interface (updateable<%>) that makes > the class deal with this stuff. (A related note syntax transformers in > the class system's interfaces might work analogous to the unit > system's) > > A syntax form that is only legal inside the the class, so it can know > what all the fields are. (Although this would probably break for a > subclass's private fields.)
I tried something a little over a year ago which introduced a new (data ...) form for data which should be copied from object to object. http://list.cs.brown.edu/pipermail/plt-scheme/2007-October/020851.html Henk _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
