On Oct 11, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
The other day, when I was extolling the merits of Scheme for agile
commercial use, someone (predictably) responded that finding Scheme
programmers was too difficult.
I'm thinking it might be helpful to have a counter on the plt-scheme
home page of estimated number of students who've been through HtDP.
Like number of Big Macs served, or the US national debt, only
desirable.
23,804, oops, no. Now it's 23,809 :-) Nice idea
Two comments:
1. Few institutions teach programmers to design documents in PHP or to
program in Ruby on Rails or Perl or Python etc and yet, shops have no
quibbles picking those systems for getting their work done. Is it
possible that such questions are just a way to throw you off? To get
the conversation stuck? If you throw out enough of those questions,
the challenger will become discouraged.
2. While I appreciate the compliments, I will say that I forbid my
students to mention Scheme on their resume. I tell them time and again
that they are not learning Scheme (there is lots more to learn before
you even scratch the surface of Scheme), and that the course isn't
about Scheme. Seriously, I would expect that someone with a full HtDP
background (or basics: I through VI) would need another semester to
get to the basic level of programming where I would even consider
someone fluent in a language. Even HtDP combined with PLAI wouldn't be
enough to get some basic tricks down. High-speed HtDP plus #lang
scheme with classes might be getting close (my MS level class).
But having said all this, keep pushing for PLT. Once Typed Scheme is
really in place, we're the only language where scripters can script
and grow up smoothly.
-- Matthias
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
