On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Matthew suggested a change to the language dialog that I've just now > checked in. Please give it a try and let me know what you think.
That is a good message for people who already grok the PLT multi-language thing. You know you guys took the 80% scenario that a single file contained a single module and made it easier for those users some time ago. You should take the 80% scenario for the language used, whatever it is, and default to the behavior that if there is no #lang line. Suppose it is 'scheme', maybe there is a good case for it, most inexperienced people use that one, and so do experienced once, and if you aren't using it then you already grok the whole multi-language thing. You guys know the most about user scenarios. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev