On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> Matthew suggested a change to the language dialog that I've just now >> checked in. Please give it a try and let me know what you think. > > That is a good message for people who already grok the PLT multi-language > thing. > > You know you guys took the 80% scenario that a single file contained a > single module and made it easier for those users some time ago. You > should take the 80% scenario for the language used, whatever it is, > and default to the behavior that if there is no #lang line. > > Suppose it is 'scheme', maybe there is a good case for it, most > inexperienced people use > that one, and so do experienced once, and if you aren't using it then > you already grok the whole multi-language thing. You guys know the > most about user scenarios.
Sorry Grant: are you saying that this isn't a good message for people who don't grok the PLT multi-language thing? I'm not quite getting what you're driving at here. Thanks, Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev