On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> There are many normalization and transition problems here. Although I
> don't like automagical conversions, the transition path looks way too
> painful unless we equate ".ss" and ".rkt" in module paths. For example,
> a lot of code that refers to collection- and Planet-based libraries
> using ".ss" forms.

Make a clean break on this release. .racket or nothing.

The amount of work doesn't justify the "reward" of only using that
extension though, does it?
_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev

Reply via email to