On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Carl Eastlund <carl.eastl...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > > > FWIW, rkt is much faster to type (for me) than something like scrbl > > because it alternates hands (on qwerty, anyways, don't know about > > others). The "cr" in scrbl is the truly painful part, tho. > > How much are we designing the name change to service the typing speed > of us few hardcore PLT hackers, and how much are we designing it to > make our system more accessible and comprehensible to outsiders? If > we're aiming for the former, why can't we keep ".ss"? Don't you want to increase the number of hardcore hackers? ;) .racket and other long extensions just look a bit too long, especially since I generally go for small modules and that means more files. If we can use .ss I am all for it, but I can live with .rkt or other short extensions. My 2 cents. Cheers. yc
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
